DEVELOPED  ROCKET-POWERED INDIVIDUAL LIFT DEVICES
											
										 
										
									Nearly 40 years have passed since  the first man flew with a rocket pack strapped on his back, and not once has  its design, originally envisioned by inventor Wendell F. Moore; ever  been improved upon by successive designs.
									All subsequent versions of the  rocketbelt have had the same disadvantages; low flight duration.  This is mainly due to the limit of how much  weight a man can carry on his back and to the fact that later versions were  copies of Moore’s who didn’t design his pack for optimized flight endurance.
									
                
                  | 
                       Device   | 
                  Bell Aerosystems Rocketbelt  | 
                  Tyler Systems Rocketpack  | 
                  American Flying  Belt  | 
                  Thunderbolt Aerosystems ThunderPack  
                       | 
                
                
                     | 
                  SRLD  | 
                     | 
                  RB2000  | 
				  TP-R1G2   | 
				  TP-R2G2  | 
                
                
                  Takeoff Weight, lbs  | 
                  277  | 
                  285  | 
                  287  | 
                  293  | 
                  350  | 
                
                
                  Empty Weight, lbs  | 
                  70   | 
                  78   | 
                  75   | 
                  58   | 
                  72   | 
                
                
                  Pilot    + Payload 
                    Pilot 
                    Payload  | 
                  160  
                    160  
                    0¹   | 
                  160  
                    160  
                    0¹   | 
                  160  
                    160  
                    0¹   | 
                  160  
                    160  
                    0¹   | 
                  180  
                    160  
                    20   | 
                
                
                  Total Fuel, lbs  | 
                  47   | 
                  47   | 
                  52   | 
                  75   | 
                  98   | 
                
                
                  Range,    feet  | 
                  866   | 
                  800   | 
                  890   | 
                  2760   | 
                  3650   | 
                
                
                  Speed,    mph  | 
                  60+   | 
                  60+   | 
                  60+   | 
                  75+   | 
                
                
                  Endurance,    seconds  | 
                  21.5²   | 
                  20²   | 
                  30²   | 
                  35²   | 
                  75²   | 
                
                
                  Type    of Fuel  | 
                  90%   | 
                  90%- H²O²   | 
                  90%- H²O²   | 
                  PERTOL³   | 
                  PERTOL/JP44   | 
                
                
                  Propellant    Isp, sec  | 
                  122   | 
                  120   | 
                  124   | 
                  133   | 
                  181   | 
                
                
                  Total    Rocket Thrust, lbs  | 
                  300   | 
                  300   | 
                  300   | 
                  335   | 
                  380   | 
                
              
              - Not designed to carry any payload
 
                - Excludes 10 seconds reserve
 
                - Specially formulated 90 – 98% H²O²
 
                - Jet Aircraft Propellant (refined kerosene)
 
 
						 
						 
					 
				 
				
			 In 1996, California engineer  Carmelo “Nino” Amarena took on the challenge of building a new generation of  rocketpacks that would break the barrier plaguing all previous pack designs and  embarked on an investigation of what needed to be done, modified or invented to  make longer flight a reality.  It was a  challenge that required much more than merely copycatting.  Amarena was trained and educated at the  Buenos Aires University of Engineering, in Argentina where he obtained his  masters degree in electro-mechanical engineering and upon immigrating to  America in 1979, made his home in California’s Silicon Valley.  
              
              
There he was able to interact with  talents in cybernetics, aerospace and electronics industry, allowing him to  acquire a set of skills, which forged his “technical generalist” background.
              His broad technical background  eventually landed him the development of a peroxide-based reciprocating engine  for GeorgiaTech Research Institute’s “Entomopter” a biomimetic robot  that flies like a “dragon fly” insect, a joint project between NASA and  GeorgiaTech planned to be sent to with a landing Mars probe mission by the end  of the first decade of the 21st century.
              
              

                  The GeorgiaTech  “Entomopter” team (Amarena is second from left, front row) and summary of  its innovations (right).
              
              
                In order to develop this new  generation rocketbelt, Amarena formed Thunderbolt Aerosystems, Inc. in 1997  with the financial help of two partners.   The company’s mission is to design and manufacture personal flight  machines for entertainment, pleasure and rescue purposes.  Its first model was dubbed ThunderPack®-R1G2 (Revision-1; Generation-2) and was sold in 2003  to a large corporation in the far east, with intentions to use the R1G2 for  rescue purposes. 
      
 
              
 The  ThunderPack-R1G1 during the prototype 
phase test (left) and on its pre-flight  standThe ThunderPack® was designed with many  similarities to Wendell Moore’s rocketbelt of the ‘60s.  Much of Moore’s work laid the foundation for  the whole idea of fitting a rocket to a man’s body.  For this reason, Thunderbolt Aerosystems  obtained many of the original technical reports from Bell Aerosystems as well  as from ex-Bell and NASA engineers, whom helped in understanding the  man-machine kinematics of flying with a rocket pushing 1,200 jet horsepower on  a person’s back.  The challenge for  Amarena, was how to lengthen its flight 
endurance.
              
The amount of time a rocket-powered vehicle can stay aloft  is dependent on how much fuel is available to burn, how much the flight vehicle  (pilot, ship and fuel) weighs and how much thrust can be generated per pound of  fuel.  It was obvious from this that the  only way to extend flight duration was by increasing the amount of fuel,  increasing the amount of thrust per pound of fuel,  (being measured in rocketry by a unit called Specific  Impulse [Isp]) and decreasing the flight vehicle weight.  With the plan formulated, work began in early  1998.  
              The ThunderPack® project began by establishing  four phases: 
              
                - The       design phase:  new and proven       ideas of rocketpacking got established.
 
                - The       prototype phase:  reliability       testing and improvements of every component and system identified in the       design phase. 
 
                - The       manufacturing phase:  final       drawing versions of the parts are produced.
 
                - The       testing phase:  assembly and       first firing of rockets, system checks, redundancy devices activation and       preparation for first tether/solo flights.
 
              
               
              
The rocket propulsion used in the  ThunderPack® -R1G2 and its later incarnation, the ThunderPack-R2G2  are very similar to Bell’s rocketbelt.   It uses a variation of hydrogen peroxide in high concentration (between  70 and 98% by weight) plus other propellant additives.  This versatile chemical discovered by the  French chemist Jules Thenard in 1818, has been used all the way from wounds’  bactericide, to rocket propulsion like those in the Mercury capsules RCS system, Redstone fuel turbo-pump power drive, lunar module lander trainer main propulsion, Bell’s X-1, X-1A and  X-15 rocket planes and many other aerospace applications.
              
When peroxide in the proper  formulation and concentration contacts certain metals at ambient temperature,  it quickly decomposes (about 10 – 100 milliseconds) into superheated steam,  oxygen gas and heat (between 1000 to 1750ºF depending on concentration).  But what makes this chemical so useful for rocket  propulsion is that for every pound of peroxide that totally decomposes, about  61 cubic feet of gas is generated or in another way; for every volume of  peroxide that is decomposed, 5,000 equal volumes of gas is generated.  If the fuel is fed into the rocket engine at a certain pressure —say 1,000psi— then the gas generated will also be at 1,000psi  and having this large volume of gas coming out of the rocket nozzles at high  pressure, its what gives the “jet” thrust to the pack.  Because the chemical reaction is produced  without flames, it is the main reason Moore chose peroxide for his pack, and  that’s why Amarena did as well.
              In order to improve the already  energetic content of hydrogen peroxide, Nino Amarena and his team launched a  search for formulas that would increase the “punch”of peroxide without making  it unstable or toxic.  The search of over  2,500 technical documents, going back as far as 1850 proved to be  productive.  The team found that, by  combining some specific additives, promoters and decomposition enhancers, it  was possible to increase the specific impulse (Isp) by almost 10% over  traditional hydrogen peroxide.  They  named the new formula PERTOL®, and applied for a patent for  placement on the aerospace market.
			   
			  
				  | 
				  | 
				  | 
			  
			  
				 ThunderPack’s  innovative throttle employs  novel ergonomic 
                “torsion control”  allowing   for finetuning to pilots’ individual preferences | 
				 A typical  peroxide reactor  engine as used in the ThunderPack | 
				ThunderPack  TP-R1G2 on a test  bench during reliability tests | 
			  
			  
 
              The extra fuel capacity and more  energetic fuel needed only to be complemented by a lighter overall system  weight in order obtain the perfect ThunderPack flight endurance. The whole pack  was built with aerospace quality materials like; Titanium, Inconel®,  Hastelloy® and Magnesium as well as composite carbon-fiber, graphite  pre-pegs and Kevlar® structures.   Through the use of these materials, the ThunderPack® was 35%  lighter (empty and without pilot) than Moore’s rocketbelt. 
              
               The final touch to lengthening  flight time, was fitting fuel tanks with twice the capacity of Moore’s.  The savings in weight while the pack is empty  (42%) is replaced by the extra weight of additional fuel capacity. Coupled with  the more energetic formulation of PERTOL®, the various models of  ThunderPacks® are capable of in excess of 45 seconds of flight  autonomy at full throttle.  Since it  burns about two pounds per second of fuel, it continually gets lighter;  therefore from take off it consumes two pounds of thrust per second less for  every second of flight.  This fact and  the pilot’s mastering of the throttle, are the main factors affecting flight  duration variations.
  
              
   
Not satisfied that all means for  extending flight endurance had been applied to the new pack design, Nino  Amarena’s team decided to add an innovative dual-fuel or bipropellant mode of  operation.  The second fuel is a  hydrocarbon or organic; like kerosene, jet gasoline, diesel or even paint  thinner, which together with the peroxide increases the Isp considerably,  lengthening the pack’s flight duration up to 75 to 90 seconds.  With the extra thrust provided by the  bipropellant mode, it was possible for the first time to have a rocketbelt  carry a payload (about 10 lbs) other than its pilot.
              
All these innovations,  improvements and refinements represent the high-technology design criteria the  ThunderPack® has undergone, making it the “ultimate” personal flying  machine!
              Thunderbolt Aerosystems is  currently looking for relocating into a larger aviation research facilities  where the fourth generation of personal flying devices, like the ThunderPack®  will evolve into the ThunderJet®.  Also additional  facilities are being built to accommodate Thunderbolt Aerosystems’ Camp-Zero® where plain mortals  will have a chance to learn to fly the ThunderPack aided by their Tether-Trainer®.
              For more information about other  scheduled appearances of ThunderBolt Aerosystems’ ThunderMan visit our UPCOMING  EVENTS & PRESS CENTER link and check the list  of upcoming events.  If you are  interested in contracting Thunderman to enhance your Public Relations efforts  check our link Entertaining Appearances for Hire.